VAPAWAY.EU - Research and education on VAP prevention
  • Home
  • Articles
  • GuideLines
  • Links
  • About VAPAWAY
  • Training
  • Contacts

Login








Lost Password?

Register to receive updated data on VAPAWAY initiative

Agenda

 

9 - 12 March 2010

ISICEM International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine - Brussels (Belgium)

ISICEM

 

9 -11 June 2010

EACTA European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists - Edinburgh (UK)

EACTA

 

12-15 June 2010

ESA European Society of Anaesthesiology - Helsinki (Finland)

ESA

 

18-22 September 2010

ERS European Respiratory Society - Barcellona (Spain)

ERS

 

9 -13 October 2010

ESICM European Society of Intensive Care Medicine - Barcellona (Spain)

ESICM

  

 

> International events   

> Local events 

THE VALUE OF PRETEST PROBABILITY AND MODIFIED CLINICAL PULMONARY INFECTION SCORE TO DIAGNOSE VENTILA PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 13 June 2008
 

Lauzier F, Ruest A, Cook D, Dodek P, Albert M, Shorr AF, Day A, Jiang X, Heyland D; for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada. Journal of Critical Care. 2008 Mar;23(1):50-57.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the utility of pretest probability and modified clinical pulmonary infection score CPIS in the diagnosis of late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 740 adults enrolled in a multicenter randomized trial, intensivists prospectively rated the pretest probability of VAP as low, moderate, or high based on their clinical judgment. The modified CPIS was calculated without considering culture results. Ventilator-associated pneumonia diagnosis was determined by 2 adjudicators using standardized definitions. We analyzed the relationship between pretest likelihood, CPIS, and VAP diagnosis.

RESULTS: Among the 739 patients analyzed, 14.5%, 39.6%, and 45.9% had low, moderate, and high pretest probability of VAP. Patients with high pretest probability had a lower PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio and a larger volume of secretions. High or moderate vs low pretest probability had high sensitivity (0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.89) and positive predictive value (0.87; 95% CI, 0.86-0.88) but low specificity (0.27; 95% CI, 0.21-0.35) and negative predictive value (0.29; 95% C,: 0.22-0.37) for the diagnosis of VAP. Therefore, 71% of patients who had a low pretest probability were actually infected (1 - negative predictive value). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the modified CPIS was not significant (0.47; 95% CI, 0.42-0.53), meaning that no score threshold was clinically useful.

CONCLUSIONS: Pretest probability and a modified CPIS, which excludes culture results, are of limited utility in the diagnosis of late-onset VAP.

Last Updated ( Friday, 13 June 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Select and watch
from the following webinars

 


Join us on www.smartonweb.org

Partner

VAPAWAY is proudly supported by Covidien.

http://www.covidien.com