VAPAWAY.EU - Research and education on VAP prevention
  • Home
  • Articles
  • GuideLines
  • Links
  • About VAPAWAY
  • Training
  • Contacts

Login








Lost Password?

Register to receive updated data on VAPAWAY initiative

Agenda

 

9 - 12 March 2010

ISICEM International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine - Brussels (Belgium)

ISICEM

 

9 -11 June 2010

EACTA European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists - Edinburgh (UK)

EACTA

 

12-15 June 2010

ESA European Society of Anaesthesiology - Helsinki (Finland)

ESA

 

18-22 September 2010

ERS European Respiratory Society - Barcellona (Spain)

ERS

 

9 -13 October 2010

ESICM European Society of Intensive Care Medicine - Barcellona (Spain)

ESICM

  

 

> International events   

> Local events 

MICROBIOLOGY OF VAP COMPARED WITH THAT OF HOSPITAL-ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA PDF Print E-mail
Wednesday, 16 January 2008
Weber DJ, Rutala WA, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Samsa GP, Brown V, Niederman MS. Department of Hospital Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Health Care System, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jul;28(7):825-31.

 

Objective: Nosocomial pneumonia is the leading cause of mortality attributed to nosocomial infection. Appropriate empirical therapy has been associated with improved survival, but data are limited regarding the etiologic agents of hospital-acquired pneumonia in nonventilated patients (HAP). This evaluation assessed whether the currently recommended empirical therapy is appropriate for both ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and HAP by evaluating the infecting flora.

Design: Prospectively collected hospitalwide surveillance data was obtained by infection control professionals using standard Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. SETTING: A tertiary care academic hospital. PATIENTS: All patients admitted from 2000 through 2003. RESULTS: A total of 588 episodes of pneumonia were reported in 556 patients: 327 episodes of VAP in 309 patients, and 261 episodes of HAP in 247 patients. The infecting flora in ventilated patients included gram-positive cocci (32.0% [oxacillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus {OSSA}, 9.25%; oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus {ORSA}, 17.75%]), gram-negative bacilli (59.0% (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 17.50%; Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, 6.75%; Acinetobacter species, 7.75%), and miscellaneous pathogens (9.0%). The infecting flora in nonventilated patients included gram-positive cocci (42.59% [OSSA, 13.33%; ORSA, 20.37%]), gram-negative bacilli (39.63% [P. aeruginosa, 9.26%; S. maltophilia, 1.11%; Acinetobacter species, 3.33%), and miscellaneous pathogens (17.78%).

Conclusions: Our data demonstrated that patients with HAP, compared with those with VAP, had a similar frequency of infection with ORSA but less commonly had infections due to P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter species, and S. maltophilia. However, the overall frequency of infection with these pathogens was sufficiently high to warrant the use of empirical therapy likely to be active against them. Our data supports using the currently recommended empirical therapy for both HAP and VAP.

 
Last Updated ( Thursday, 14 February 2008 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Select and watch
from the following webinars

 


Join us on www.smartonweb.org

Partner

VAPAWAY is proudly supported by Covidien.

http://www.covidien.com