VAPAWAY.EU - Research and education on VAP prevention
  • Home
  • Articles
  • GuideLines
  • Links
  • About VAPAWAY
  • Training
  • Contacts

Login








Lost Password?

Register to receive updated data on VAPAWAY initiative

Agenda

 

9 - 12 March 2010

ISICEM International Symposium on Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine - Brussels (Belgium)

ISICEM

 

9 -11 June 2010

EACTA European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiologists - Edinburgh (UK)

EACTA

 

12-15 June 2010

ESA European Society of Anaesthesiology - Helsinki (Finland)

ESA

 

18-22 September 2010

ERS European Respiratory Society - Barcellona (Spain)

ERS

 

9 -13 October 2010

ESICM European Society of Intensive Care Medicine - Barcellona (Spain)

ESICM

  

 

> International events   

> Local events 

DEFINING, TREATING AND PREVENTING HOSPITAL ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA: EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE PDF Print E-mail
Friday, 23 January 2009

Torres A, Ewig S, Lode H, Carlet J; For The European HAP working group.
Servei de Pneumologia i Allèrgia Respiratòria. Institut Clínic del Tòrax, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain. 
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Jan;35(1):9-29.  


 

INTRODUCTION: Many controversies still remain in the management of hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP), and ventilation-acquired pneumonia (VAP), Three European Societies, European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), were interested in producing a document on HAP and VAP with European perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The scientific committees from each Society designated one chairman; Antoni Torres (ERS), Harmut Lode (ESCMID) and Jean Carlet (ESICM). The chairmen of this Task Force suggested names from each Society to be a member of the panel. They also chose controversial topics on the field and others that were not covered by the last IDSA/ATS guidelines. Each topic was assigned to a pair of members to be reviewed and written. Finally, the panel defined 20 consensual points that were circulated several times among the members of the panel until total agreement was reached. A combination of evidences and clinical-based medicine was used to reach these consensus.

CONCLUSIONS: This manuscript reviews in depth several controversial or new topics in HAP and VAP. In addition 20 consensual points are presented. This manuscript may be useful for the development of future guidelines and to stimulate clinical research by lying out what is currently accepted and what is unknown or controversial.

Last Updated ( Tuesday, 21 July 2009 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Select and watch
from the following webinars

 


Join us on www.smartonweb.org

Partner

VAPAWAY is proudly supported by Covidien.

http://www.covidien.com